Legal Opinion

State v. Evoniuk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 1986No. 10-84-09089, 10-84-09093 CA A35174 (Control), CA A37414PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The State appeals an order suppressing evidence granted on the ground that the affidavit for a search warrant did not establish probable cause under the Fourth Amendment and Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. Defendant Evoniuk was indicted for unlawful possession of a controlled substance (cocaine), unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance (marijuana) and eight counts of being an ex-convict in possession of a concealable firearm, in violation of ORS 475.992(4)(b), 475.992(1)(a) and 166.270, respectively. Defendant Niemi was indicted for unlawful possession of a controlled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. ChezemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. SevenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. BeaglesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API