Legal Opinion

High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 17, 1995No. C-93-4152 SBA (PJH)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: THIRD PARTY’S MOTION FOR FEES PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.PRO. 45

HAMILTON, United States Magistrate Judge.

The third party, Townsend and Townsend Khourie and Crew’s (“Townsend”) motion for fees pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 45 was heard on March 3, 1995. Jennifer Pizer appeared on behalf of Townsend. Michael Molano appeared on behalf of defendant New Image Industries, Inc. (“New Image”). Having heard the parties’ arguments and read their briefs, this court orders as follows.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, High Tech Medical Instrumentation (“HTMI”), holder of U.S. Patent No. 4,858,001 (“ ’001…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tutor-Saliba Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  2. Angell v. Shawmut Bank Connecticut National Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1994

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Soto v. Castlerock Farming & Transport, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
  2. Polo Building Group, Inc. v. Rakita (In Re Shubov)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Intermarine, LLC v. Spliethoff Bevrachtingskantoor, B.V.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. McCabe v. Ernst & Young, LLPDistrict Court, D. New York · 2004
  5. (PC) Beltran v. GuerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API