Intermarine, LLC v. Spliethoff Bevrachtingskantoor, B.V.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
Re: Dkt. No. 1
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Non-party Drópbox, Inc., which is located in this District, has received a Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in Intermarine, LLC v. Spliethoff Bevrachtingskantoor, B.V., 4:14-07-00145, currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas .(the “Texas Court”). Dropbox now moves for an order quashing the *1216Deposition Subpoena. Dkt. No. 1. Having- considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and- the record in this case, the Court issues…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- O'GRADY v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- United States v. Yitchak Ijo PerlmuterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Datel Holdings Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Appel v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Appel v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Castro v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Evanston Insurance Company v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Hi, Inc. v. Zeetogroup, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.