McCabe v. Ernst & Young, LLP
District Court, D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIGENTON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Vertex Interactive, Inc. (“Vertex”), Nicholas Toms, Donald Rowley, Raymond Broek, Barbara Martorano, Joseph Robinson, Wayne Clevenger1 and Jeffrey Marks, Esq.2 (collectively, the “Movants”), seek counsel fees, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(c)(2)(B), incurred in complying with subpoenas served by plaintiffs Daniel McCabe, et al. (“Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs have opposed the Motion. The Court decides the Motion based upon the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is denied.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Linder, David v. Calero-PortocarreroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Williams v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Tutor-Saliba Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Angell v. KellyDistrict Court, D. North Carolina · 2006
- DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-cv-14753District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- CANCA v. WAYFAIR, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC. v. NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN, P.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- RUCKER v. HUNTERDON MEDICAL CENTERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.