Wilson v. Coffey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
The appellant has appealed from a judgment rendered following an order granting a motion made by respondent under section 633 of the Code of Civil Procedure, whereby the original judgment was vacated and a different judgment entered. The action is for specific performance of a contract to purchase land; the appellant being the vendee and the respondent the vendor thereof. In the original judgment specific performance of the contract was denied; the respondent was denied damages, and a fund of $5,000, which had been deposited with the clerk of the court, was ordered to be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Cannon v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- McDonald v. HuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2003
- Brown v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Hastings v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Steel v. DuntleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Wilson v. CoffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.