Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1947No. Civ. 15706PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

On June 22, 1944, respondents were owners of lots 12 and 13 of the Hallowell tract in Los Angeles County. On that day appellants agreed to deposit in an escrow with defendant bank the sum of $3,500 to be paid to respondents whenever the bank should have filed for recordation a sufficient conveyance such as would entitle the bank to procure an owner’s policy of title insurance issued by the Title Insurance and Trust Company or National Title Insurance Company showing title of the two lots vested in appellants subject to certain specified exceptions. At the same time appellants deposited $500…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hildebrand v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Widess v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Wilson v. CoffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del ReyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Tribeca Companies, LLC v. First American Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Titcher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  4. Hart v. BarronMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Norris v. San Mateo County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API