Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. DMSI Staffing, LLC.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 3, 2015No. C-14-1531 EMCPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

(Docket No. 39)

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge

On February 27, 2014, Plaintiff Martina Hernandez filed a class action complaint *1057alleging various violations of California’s labor code and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and bringing a representative claim under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Docket No. 1-1 (“Compl.”). Ms. Hernandez brought this action against DMSI Staffing, LLC (“DMSI”) and Ross Stores, Inc. (“Ross”) (collectively “Defendants”). Pending before the Court is Defendants’…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Levin v. Caviar, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Zenelaj v. Handybook Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Mohamed v. Uber TechnologiesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API