Legal Opinion

Zenelaj v. Handybook Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 3, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-05449-TEHPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to compel the arbitration of Plaintiffs’ complaint. After carefully considering the arguments presented in the Parties’ written and oral submissions, Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration is hereby GRANTED, for the reasons set forth below.

BACKGROUND

Defendant Handybook is a technology company that offers an online platform through which customers in need of cleaning services can connect to independent cleaning professionals. Plaintiffs Vilma and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cordas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  2. Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Levin v. Caviar, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. SteppeChange LLC v. Veon Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API