Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Ball

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 10957PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Both appellants and respondents being desirous that a rehearing be granted in this case, appellants questioning the correctness of the decision in holding that the cause of action was brought to recover a penalty, and hence was not assignable, and respondents questioning the correctness of the conclusion that the action was saved from abatement by the general provision of section 404 of the Civil Code, and amici curiae, joining with respondents in a petition to grant a rehearing, a rehearing was granted in order that further consideration might be given to the respective contentions…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hornor v. HenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Winchester v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
  3. Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Western Mortgage & Guaranty Co. v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API