Legal Opinion

Stone v. Christensen

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 23, 1940No. 487PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

Harry W. Stone brings complaint against certain administrative and executive officers of the State of Oregon and the United States asking for a declaration that he is free of obligation to register under the terms of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 1 and restraining any prosecution of Stone for failure to comply with the provision thereof requiring registration of “every male citizen * * * between the ages of twenty-one and thirty-six”.

The grounds for such relief are that registration will subject Stone to military training and he will thereby…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Odis R. Van Buskirk v. Fred T. Wilkinson, as Warden of the United States Penitentiary, McNeil Island, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Richter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Osage Tribe of Indians v. IckesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
  5. United States v. RichmondDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API