Legal Opinion

Richter v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1950No. 12282_1PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, circuit judge.

Appellant Richter was found guilty of willful failure to register for selective service under the provisions of the Selective Service Act of 1948, 50 U.S.C.A.Appeñdix, § 451 et seq. On appeal, Richter, .a conscientious objector, claims that the Act, as applied to him, violates his right of religious freedom under the First Amendment, and is, therefore, unconstitutional. .The district court proceeded, for the purpose of the case, on the assumption that appellant’s beliefs were religious in character, within the meaning and protection of the First Amendment, but,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Davis v. BeasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Tyrrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Frederic Wayne Etcheverry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. EramdjianDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957
  5. Jack Warren Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API