Legal Opinion

Zellerbach v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1934No. Civ. 9665PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioners seek by writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to set aside its order discharging an order to show cause directed to Arthur Zellerbach and further to compel said court to order said Arthur Zellerbach to testify as a witness upon the taking of a deposition.

In an action brought by said Arthur Zellerbach as plaintiff against the petitioners and others as defendants, petitioners sought to take the deposition of said plaintiff. On June 1, 1934, petitioners obtained a subpoena from the county clerk upon the affidavit of Hugh R Bolander, Jr., which subpoena directed said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christ v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Crocker v. ConreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Pollak v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Scott v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Wissman v. CabanissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Golden State Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Melancon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Golden State Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API