Legal Opinion

Pollak v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 11560PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J., pro tem.

Petitioners seek by this proceeding in certiorari to have annulled an order made by the Superior Court in and for the county of Napa, directing the clerk of that court to issue a subpoena requiring petitioners, who are residents of the city and county of San Francisco, to appear as witnesses and to give their depositions before a notary public in the city of Napa, in an action brought by Keig Shoe Company, Inc., against petitioners, in the justice’s court of the city and county of San Francisco.

It appears from the record that said Keig Shoe Company sued petitioners first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Scott v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Merrill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wemyss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Zellerbach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API