Legal Opinion
Holm v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1954No. S. F. 18781PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
42 Cal.2d 500 (1954)
267 P.2d 1025
DION R. HOLM, City Attorney, etc., et al., Petitioners,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; WYNONA BELL, Real Party in Interest.
Docket No. S.F. 18781.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
March 12, 1954.
Dion R. Holm, City Attorney (San Francisco) and Donald J. Kropp, Deputy City Attorney, for Petitioners.
Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and Roy Bronson as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondent.
Shirley, Saroyan, Calvert & Barbagelata and J. Francis Shirley for Real Party in Interest.
SHENK, J.
The…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rademan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001