In Re Potter
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed, to the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. •
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Petitioner is held under arrest by virtue of two criminal complaints, the one charging him with a violation of the so-called “Poison Act,” the other with a violation of a resolution and regulation prescribed by the state board of pharmacy under and by virtue of certain provisions of the Poison Act. The legal questions presented under the two applications are intimately related and may be considered together.
The so-called “Poison Act” is “An act to regulate the sale of poisons in the state of California and providing a penalty for the violation thereof.” It was approved March 6, 1907. (Stats.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Swamp Land District No. 307 v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- United States v. MoodyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1908
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re PeppersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Gilgert v. Stockton Port DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Moore v. Municipal Court of Salinas Judicial Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. KuderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.