Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. French

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1926No. Docket No. 5570PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment against them in an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of the fraud and misrepresentations of the defendants.

The defendant J. M. French is engaged in the real estate business in Los Angeles, as a .duly licensed real estate broker, doing business under the fictitious name of J. M. French Company. The defendant F. H. Russell is a real estate salesman, working in the office of J. M. French •Company, and the defendant Wet a G. Glassell was one of the clients of this office and formerly owned certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boas v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Williamson v. ClapperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Lewis v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Benner v. HooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Springer v. Angeles Credit Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API