Legal Opinion

Springer v. Angeles Credit Co., Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1941No. Civ. 12781PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Prom a judgment awarding damages in favor of plaintiff, after trial before the court without a jury, in an action based upon fraud and to rescind a contract, defendants appeal.

Defendants rely for reversal of the judgment on these propositions:

First: There is no substantial evidence to sustain the following findings of the trial court:(a) Plaintiff purchased a business including the fixtures and stock in trade of defendant Palmer’s drug store.(b) “It is true that for the purpose of inducing plaintiff to purchase the said business, its fixtures, and stock in trade, as aforementioned, and with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bate v. JolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Winzeler v. CastorinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Hamilton v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Beckley v. ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brunswig Drug Co. v. SpringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Baker v. FerrelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Wishnick v. FryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Wood v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Springer v. Angeles Credit Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API