Legal Opinion
U.S. Steel Mining Co. v. District 17, United Mine Workers
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1990No. 89-2921PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
United States Steel Mining Co. (the company) and the United States Steel and Carnegie Pension Fund (the fund) appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to recover restitution for monies paid pursuant to a state court injunction and attorney’s fees. The district court found that the company had no standing and the court had no jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. We affirm on a different ground. We find that section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3), provides no remedy in federal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Arkadelphia Co. v. St. Louis SW Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Singer v. Black & Decker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Steel Mining Co., Inc. v. District 17, United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Crosby v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Crosby v. CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1992
- Crown Clothing Co. v. PapaleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.