Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Crosby
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 18, 1992No. Civ. Y-90-2513PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Margaret Crosby and defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (“Metropolitan”) and General Motors Corporation (“General Motors”) have filed motions for summary judgment. Metropolitan has also filed a motion for summary judgment on its cross-claim against Joan Crosby. After a consideration of the pleadings, finding no disputed issues of material facts, Defendants’ motions for partial summary judgment will be granted, and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be granted in part.
FACTS
Plaintiff Margaret Crosby married…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ivy Rogers v. Unionmutual Stock Life Insurance Company of America v. John Wilson Vargo, of the Estate of Barbara Ann Vargo Rogers, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Union Labor Life Insurance v. ParmelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Crosby v. CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- U.S. Steel Mining Co. v. District 17, United Mine WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Coots v. Allstate Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Beltway Paving Company, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Eremah v. Assurity Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Margaret Crosby v. Joan Crosby, General Motors Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Margaret Crosby v. Joan Crosby General Motors Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993