Legal Opinion

Siau v. Kassel

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 3, 2006No. 4133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORT, J.:

Kal Kassel appeals from a decision restraining and enjoining him from building any permanent structure within thirty feet of his rear property line and ordering him to remove all permanent structures currently located within thirty feet of his rear property line. Kassel contends the trial court erred in determining ownership of land through the “Public Trust Doctrine,” balancing the equities, and failing to determine his rights against Georgetown County. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1997, Kassel and Millard Dozier purchased a single lot bordering the Waccamaw River in a Georgetown County…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. County of Richland v. SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buffington v. T.O.E. EnterprisesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Riley v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Time Warner Cable v. Condo Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Arcadian Shores Single Family Homeowners Ass'n v. CromerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API