Legal Opinion

County of Richland v. Simpkins

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 2002No. 3457PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Richland County (the County) filed this action seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions against Willie D. Simpkins, doing business as Mr. Lucky’s. While the action was pending, the County moved to enjoin Simpkins from operating Mr. Lucky’s until the final adjudication of the merits of the action. The trial court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction. The County appeals. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The County adopted the Sexually Oriented Businesses Ordinance (the ordinance) effective August 1, 1987. 1 In its complaint, the County alleged numerous violations of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  3. Metts v. WenbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. City of Columbia v. Pic-A-Flick Video, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Helsel v. City of North Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Scratch Golf Co. v. Dunes West Residential Golf Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Strategic Resources Co. v. BCS Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Allegro, Inc. v. ScullyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Grosshuesch v. CramerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Poynter Investments, Inc. v. Century Builders of Piedmont, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API