Markva v. Haveman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a class-action challenge to that portion of the Michigan Medicaid plan’s methodology for calculating eligibility and benefits for relatives caring for dependent children that treats non-parents differently from parents. Under Michigan’s plan, “medically needy” caretakers of dependent children must incur a specific amount of monthly out-of-pocket expenses for medical care before they are eligible to receive Medicaid benefits: the higher an applicant’s “countable” household income, the more money the applicant must “spend down” before…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wayne Thomas Ahlers and Nina Ahlers v. Ronald J. SchebilCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Michigan Express, Inc. Mahmoud Abdallah Nabil Ajami v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Metropolitan Hospital v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Rhoads v. Board of Education of Mad River Local School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Brown v. Columbus Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.