Legal Opinion

Markva v. Haveman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2003No. 01-2509PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a class-action challenge to that portion of the Michigan Medicaid plan’s methodology for calculating eligibility and benefits for relatives caring for dependent children that treats non-parents differently from parents. Under Michigan’s plan, “medically needy” caretakers of dependent children must incur a specific amount of monthly out-of-pocket expenses for medical care before they are eligible to receive Medicaid benefits: the higher an applicant’s “countable” household income, the more money the applicant must “spend down” before…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wayne Thomas Ahlers and Nina Ahlers v. Ronald J. SchebilCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Michigan Express, Inc. Mahmoud Abdallah Nabil Ajami v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Metropolitan Hospital v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Rhoads v. Board of Education of Mad River Local School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Brown v. Columbus Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API