Legal Opinion
State of Texas v. USA
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 26, 2015No. 15-40238PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Twenty-six states (the “states”) are challenging the government’s1 Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program (“DAPA”) as violative of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution. The district court determined that the states are likely to succeed on their, procedural APA claim, so it temporarily enjoined implementation of the program. Texas v. United States, Civ. No. B-14-254, — F.Supp.3d —, 2015 WL 648579 (S.D.Tex. Feb. 16, 2015). The United States appealed the preliminary injunction…
2Cases cited106 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Joseph Arpaio v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.