Legal Opinion

State v. Algeo

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2013No. CC CR100607; SC S060830PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

Petitioner is a crime victim who filed a claim pursuant to ORS 147.515, alleging that the trial court had violated her right to “receive prompt restitution” under Article I, section 42(1) (d), 1 of the Oregon Constitution. The trial court entered an order denying petitioner’s claim, and, pursuant to ORS 147.539, petitioner sought direct review of that order in this court. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s order.

The material facts are procedural and undisputed. Petitioner and her friend were crossing a street late at night when defendant, who had been drinking, hit them…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Burt v. BlumenauerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API