Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Charles Schweinler Press

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 13, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

Motion made under subdivision 2 of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act to bring in as additional parties defendant the Eastern Color Printing Co., Inc., the Newell-Emmett Company, Inc., and the Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Co., Inc. The first proposed additional defendant is sought to be brought in merely because it is the assignor of the plaintiff, upon the claim for which the suit is brought. The second proposed additional defendant is sought to be brought in merely because it acted as agent in the transaction with the third proposed additional defendant, and the third proposed additional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Municipal Service Real Estate Co. v. D. B. & M. Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Travlos v. Commercial Union of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Neuss, Hesslein & Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1923
  5. Warren v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API