Legal Opinion

Warren v. May

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants Selleck were brought in as defendants in tMs negligence action by the service upon them of the answer of defendant May, setting up a counterclaim against the plaintiff and the Selleeks under the provisions of section 271 of the Civil Practice Act. They had not been made parties by the plaintiff, although it may be that they were concurrently negligent in the accident that occurred. Defendants Selleck made a motion to strike out their names as alleged parties, to strike out the allegations contained in the counterclaim in relation to them, to dismiss the counterclaim set forth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Greenhouse v. Rochester Taxicab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. George W. Woods, Inc. v. AlthauserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Tanbro Fabrics Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Carey v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Hughes v. Charles Schweinler PressCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
  4. Humphrey v. Conroy Motor Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. John D. Quinn, Inc. v. Inspiration Enterprises, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API