Legal Opinion
Municipal Service Real Estate Co. v. D. B. & M. Holding Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The defendant D. B. & M. Holding Corporation conveyed to the plaintiff certain premises in the city of New York, by deed containing a warranty of title. The plaintiff has brought an action against its grantor for breach of that warranty. The National Sugar Refining Company had conveyed the premises to the defendant by deed containing a similar warranty of title. Upon application of the defendant the court ordered that the National Sugar Refining Company be brought in as an additional party defendant. In accordance with the provisions of subdivision 2, section 193 of the Civil Practice Act,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brewster v. CountrymanNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Charles F. Garrigues Company v. . Casualty Company of Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Chamberlain v. PrebleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1865
3Cited by26 opinions
- Nichols v. Clark, MacMullen & Riley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Mirsky v. Seaich Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Aaron Flanzbaum, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Style of Davaar Industries Limited v. M & M Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Eisenbach v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.