Legal Opinion

Neuss, Hesslein & Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

The action is by buyer against seller, for damages caused by the existence of impurities in beer coloring that was sold. The defendant moved for an order bringing in as a party the seller to it of the coloring, so that its possible claim against its seller, if defendant were found liable to the plaintiff, could be litigated in the same action. The motion was denied upon the ground that the action was. commenced prior to the coming into effect of the Civil Practice Act, and that the provisions of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act, under which the motion was made, cannot be applied to it,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Travlos v. Commercial Union of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Lewis H. May Co. v. Mott Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hejza v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Williams v. Flagg Storage Warehouse Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Murray v. MastroeniNew York Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API