Cummings v. Bailey
New York Supreme Court
Suit to enjoin the defendants from expelling plaintiffs from membership in the Democratic State Committee.
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
If the State committee as at present organized and constituted is a mere voluntary association, not representative in.character, and the right to membership depends upon the action of the body itself, then its members have no right to appeal to the courts to interfere in its management. In that case, to quote from Judge Gray in McKane v. Adams, 123 N. Y. 609, membership is a privilege which may be “ accorded or withheld and not a right which may be gained independently and then enforced.”
If, on the other hand, it is a representative body and the plaintiffs are members by reason of their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Coffey v. Democratic General CommitteeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Schuyler v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- McKane v. . AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- In re WoodworthNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- In re BroatNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Battipaglia v. Executive Committee of Democratic County CommitteeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- People ex rel. McCarren v. DoolingNew York Supreme Court · 1908