Legal Opinion

In re Woodworth

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

At chambers. Application by Hugh H. Woodworth and others to compel the cleric of Seneca county to print their names, as the regular nominees of the Republican party, on the ballots to be used at an approaching election.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This is a proceeding under section IS, c. 262, Laws 1890, to compel the clerk of Seneca county to print upon the official ballot to be used at the approaching election the names of certain parties claiming to be regularly nominated candidates of the Republican party of that county, and its determination involves an adjudication between rival factions of the party, each claiming to be the regular organization. This simple statement of the nature of the duty imposed is sufficient to indicate that it is one from which any judicial officer would gladly escape were it possible to do so without…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cook v. HouserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Stephenson v. Boards of Election CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Walling v. LansdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. In re MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. In re PollardNew York Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API