Blied v. Barnard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Steele county to recover possession of a stock of dry goods or for $3,000, the value thereof.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Steele county to recover possession of a stock of dry goods or for $3,000, the value thereof. The amended answer admitted possession of the goods at the time of the commencement of the action, and that they were of the value of $3,000; alleged that defendant received a bill of sale from plaintiff for the stock of goods; that about January 15, 1910, defendant as a consideration for the goods had transferred a piece of land in Clackamas county, Oregon, to plaintiff; that the title was imperfect, but that defendant had issued a bond in the sum of $5,000,…
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This action was in replevin to recover the possession or value of a stock of dry goods alleged to be unlawfully detained by defendant. The goods were taken from defendant’s possession on the writ. The case came on for trial before the court and a jury, and the ultimate question to be decided was whether plaintiff or defendant was entitled to the stock of goods. The facts developed at the trial, stated only with sufficient detail to indicate the issues, were as follows:
January 15, 1910, plaintiff sold to defendant the stock of dry goods in question, in exchange for thirty-four acres of land in…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Saavedra v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Anderson v. Olivia State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Blied v. BarnardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Storms v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.