Blied v. Barnard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Steele county. The case was tried before Childress, J., and a jury which answered in the negative the question whether plaintiff was justified in refusing to accept the bond of February 12, 1910, and a general verdict in favor of defendant for the return of the property or $2,260.51 in ease it could not be returned. From an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action of replevin by the plaintiff mortgagee in a chattel mortgage to recover of the defendant mortgagor the property mortgaged. The sheriff seized a portion of the mortgaged property. The defendant did not rebond, and it was delivered to the plaintiff. There was a verdict in favor of the defendant for the possession of the property ■or the sum of $2,260.51 in case it could not be returned. The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
The case has been before this court twice and is reported in 116 Minn. 307, 133 N. W. 795, and 120…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blied v. BarnardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Blied v. BarnardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. KlaffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Remington v. SavageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Blied v. BarnardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915