Legal Opinion

United States v. Tucker

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 19, 1983No. ACM 23896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

In a single assignment of error, Sergeant Tucker asserts that:

THE ACCUSED WAS DENIED A FAIR HEARING ON SENTENCE WHEN, SHORTLY BEFORE HIS TRIAL, HIS COMMANDING OFFICER ADMONISHED OTHER MEMBERS OF HIS UNIT TO DISASSOCIATE THEMSELVES FROM THE ACCUSED AND THREE OTHER INDIVIDUALS WHO WERE ABOUT TO BE TRIED BY COURTS-MARTIAL FOR DRUG OFFENSES, AND FURTHER DIRECTED THAT ANY SENIOR NCOs CONSULT COMMAND OFFICIALS BEFORE TESTIFYING FOR THE DEFENSE IN ANY OF THE PENDING PROCEEDINGS.

This allegation raises most serious questions as to the integrity of the court-martial process.

A…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. RosserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. LovettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. CharlesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. FairchildU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AlexanderU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. TuckerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. HarrisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. United States v. CruzU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API