United States v. Alexander
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McKAY, Senior Judge:
Specialist Five Alexander was convicted of distribution of marijuana in the hashish form on two different occasions.1 The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to be reduced to the grade of E-l, to forfeit all pay and allowances, to be confined at hard labor for 10 years, and to be dishonorably discharged. Alexander now contends the military judge erred by failing to dismiss the charges because of unlawful command influence and, secondly, by failing to conduct a full investigation into his allegations of unlawful command influence. We agree…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. RosserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. TreakleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. HawthorneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. CruzU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. GiarratanoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. CorriereU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. CamposU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. SerranoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.