Legal Opinion
Conte Bros. Automotive v. Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 28, 1998No. Civil Action 97-3796(JBS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
In this false advertising and consumer fraud case, plaintiffs have sued on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, seeking injunctive and monetary relief. The matter presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint or, alternatively, to strike plaintiffs’ class action allegations. Defendants argue that the complaint should be dismissed because (a) plaintiffs lack standing to pursue their claims, and (b) plaintiffs cannot establish the damages element essential to a claim under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- No. 98-5136Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- 800-JR Cigar, Inc. v. GoTo. Com, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Papergraphics Intern., Inc. v. CorreaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.