Legal Opinion

State v. MacNab

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 24, 2008No. CM0220328; A131772PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on one count of failure to report as a sex offender. ORS 181.599. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal based on the state’s failure to prove venue. Specifically, he contends that the state did not offer any evidence that his failure to report occurred in the county where the charge was brought. The state concedes that there is no direct evidence of venue. It contends that there is, however, circumstantial evidence in that it showed that defendant resided in the same county a year before the offense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. Lopez-MedinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. MeansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DepecheCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Hannemann v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. HennagirCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. HinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API