Legal Opinion

State v. Hennagir

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 2011No. 08CR1498MI; A140446PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant, a 65-year-old male, was convicted of third-degree sexual abuse and attempted third-degree rape, after engaging in sexual conduct with a 14-year-old female. On appeal, defendant argues that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the attempted rape conviction because no reasonable juror could infer, on this record, that defendant intended to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim, as opposed to some other criminal sexual conduct. In a separate assignment of error, defendant argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the court erred in allowing the state to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. LupoliOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. CuevasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API