Legal Opinion

State v. Means

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2007No. 050331762; A129823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Defendant was convicted of six counts each of identity theft, ORS 165.800, and fraudulent use of a credit card, ORS 165.055, relating to six transactions with a stolen credit card. On appeal, she challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in support of the convictions on Counts 11, 12, and 13 (alleging identity theft) and Counts 17, 18, and 19 (alleging fraudulent use of a credit card), which related to three of those transactions. Defendant argues that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to allow a jury to infer that she made the transactions. She also argues that the evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MacNabCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. MarlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API