Legal Opinion

State v. Mendez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 16, 2018No. AC41116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.

In this direct criminal appeal, the self-represented defendant, Kezlyn Mendez, claims that the trial court violated his right to due process by improperly granting his court-appointed appellate counsel's motion for leave to withdraw her appearance in accordance with Practice Book § 62-9 (d). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Practice Book § 62-9 (d) (1) directs any appointed appellate counsel who concludes, in accordance with Practice Book § 43-34, that an appeal would be wholly frivolous to file under seal with the appellate clerk a motion for leave to withdraw his or her appearance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. PascucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  2. Alston v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API