State v. Mendez
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.
In this direct criminal appeal, the self-represented defendant, Kezlyn Mendez, claims that the trial court violated his right to due process by improperly granting his court-appointed appellate counsel's motion for leave to withdraw her appearance in accordance with Practice Book § 62-9 (d). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Practice Book § 62-9 (d) (1) directs any appointed appellate counsel who concludes, in accordance with Practice Book § 43-34, that an appeal would be wholly frivolous to file under seal with the appellate clerk a motion for leave to withdraw his or her appearance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. PascucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reynolds v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Alston v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025