Legal Opinion

State v. Pascucci

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 25, 1971PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.

This appeal presents a very narrow issue. The defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the court erred in denying his motion for the appointment of counsel to represent him on an appeal to this court and for an extension of time to file the appeal.

There is no dispute on the facts. On a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty of breaking and entering a dwelling house in the day season and, on a supplemental information, also tried to a jury, found guilty of being a second offender. He is an indigent person and was represented by the public defender. Judgment was rendered July 10, 1969.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fredericks v. ReinckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lorthe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. People v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Riddick v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API