State v. Pascucci
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
This appeal presents a very narrow issue. The defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the court erred in denying his motion for the appointment of counsel to represent him on an appeal to this court and for an extension of time to file the appeal.
There is no dispute on the facts. On a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty of breaking and entering a dwelling house in the day season and, on a supplemental information, also tried to a jury, found guilty of being a second offender. He is an indigent person and was represented by the public defender. Judgment was rendered July 10, 1969.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fredericks v. ReinckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lorthe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- People v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Riddick v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.