Legal Opinion

Crawford v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 2011No. 0703041; A140535PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s denial of his request for attorney fees under ORS 656.386(l)(b)(B) after he prevailed in overcoming a denied claim for an omitted medical condition. SAIF responds that claimant did not meet the statutory requirements under which a prevailing party can obtain attorney fees and, in a cross-assignment of error, asserts that claimant should not have prevailed in the underlying claim and is not entitled to attorney fees on that ground as well. We conclude that the board correctly determined that SAIF had erroneously denied the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Young v. Hermiston Good SamaritanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Troupe v. Labor Ready, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Walker v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Labor Ready v. MogensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. SAIF Corp. v. TranerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API