Legal Opinion

De Los-Santos v. Si Pac Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 2016No. 1103363; A157315PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Claimant petitions for review of a final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. In that order, the board upheld insurer’s denial of claimant’s “new medical or omitted medical condition” claim under ORS 656.267.1 Finding no error by the board, we affirm.

Claimant accidentally injured her back at work and made a claim for workers’ compensation benefits for that injury. Insurer concluded that claimant had suffered a com-pensable injury and accepted her claim. As required by ORS 656.262(6)(b)(A),2 insurer’s notice of acceptance specified the accepted condition that insurer found to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. Hermiston Good SamaritanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. K-MART v. EvensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Boeing Aircraft Co. v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Horizon Air Industries, Inc. v. Davis-WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. SAIF Corp. v. BalesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. DeBoard v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. SAIF v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. Deboard (In re Deboard)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Marsh v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Marsh)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API