Legal Opinion

United States v. Naranjo

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 28, 2014No. Criminal No. 1993-0418Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) Crim. No. 93-418-04(TFH) vs. ) ) ) JOSE NARANJO, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Jose Naranjo has filed a "Motion to Vacate Judgment for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Petition for Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241; Alternative Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis; or Audita Querela or by Rule 60(b)." ECF No. [600] ("Motion to Vacate"). This Court finds it lacks jurisdiction to entertain def`endant’s motion and will now dismiss the motion. In July of 1995, Naranjo was convicted of drug…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trenkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. AkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. United States v. Naranjo, JoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. TchibassaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API