United States v. Naranjo, Jose
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
After this Court denied Jose Naranjo’s (“the Defendant”) appeal from the district court’s denial of his collateral review motion, he moved for rehearing or alternatively to amend his motion to include a new claim. In this motion, for the first time the Defendant claims that his sentence should be vacated following the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because both the district court and this Court already have denied the Defendant’s collateral review motion based on the claims he raised originally, and because he does not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- The Dartmouth Review, on Behalf of Its Officers, Staff and Subscribers v. Dartmouth CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Richardson, Roy Dale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Richard Dale Talbott, Applicant v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Independent Petroleum Ass'n of America v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. BerghuisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Rinat Akhmetshin v. William BrowderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- United States v. KoontzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- United States v. NaranjoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. NaranjoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.