Legal Opinion
Archangel Diamond Corp. v. Lukoil
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 19, 2005No. 04SC455PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOURLIS, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in Archangel Diamond Corp. v. Arkhangelskgeoldobycha, 94 P.3d 1208 (Colo.App.2004), in which that court held that a trial court addressing a C.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) motion may decide disputed jurisdictional facts without holding an evidentiary hearing. We now conclude that a trial court may not decide material issues of disputed jurisdictional fact against a plaintiff without such a hearing. Our ease law and rules indicate that a plaintiff must establish a pri-ma facie case of personal jurisdiction to overcome a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- AST Sports Science, Inc. v. CLF Distribution Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Melea, Ltd. v. Jawer SaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Villanueva v. Account Discovery Systems, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.