Legal Opinion

Pohl, Inc. of America v. Webelhuth

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2008No. 20070622PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 This case asks us to decide whether Utah's long-arm statute extends to defendants who allegedly engaged in a conspiracy to tortiously interfere with the plaintiff's contract and economic opportunities. We address whether Utah's long-arm statute provides for jurisdiction over individuals who never physically entered Utah but who conspired to cause tortious injury in Utah, and directed their actions toward Utah knowing that they would cause tortious injury there. We hold that it does.

BACKGROUND

12 When reviewing a district court's grant of a motion to dismiss, "we…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States of America v. Avx Corporation, National Wildlife Federation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ryan Harvey, Rocks Off, Inc. v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Energy Claims Ltd. v. Catalyst Investment Group Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Pinder v. DuchesneUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Wittingham v. TNE Limited PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2020

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API