Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Wickes
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1928No. Docket No. 3156PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
-On the second day of June, 1923, the plaintiff was employed by the defendants, acting as Trustees of the Glenn County High School District, to serve as principal in the schools of said High School District. The written instrument evidencing such employment and the acceptance by the plaintiff thereof is in the words and following, to wit:
“Notice of Employment.
“To the Superintendent of Schools:
“You are hereby.notified that the Board of Trustees or City Board of Education of Glenn County High School District in the County of Glenn and State of California, held a regular meeting on June 2, 1923,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Goldsmith v. Board of Education of Sacramento City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Alexander v. Manton Joint Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Saxton v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Titus v. Lawndale School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Kast v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963