Fitzgerald v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant, The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Company d/b/a U.S. West Communications, Inc. (hereinafter U.S. West) appeals from the denial of its post-trial motion seeking a new trial on the issue of damages, or remittitur.1 U.S. West contends that the jury award in this action for race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 was the result of passion or prejudice, that the jury should not have been allowed to consider punitive damages, and the jury should have been instructed that unreimbursed expenses should be deducted from any compensatory…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- 69 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 163, 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,785 Laurie Fitzgerald and Aaron Hazard v. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company D/B/A U.S. West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. Cloverleaf Farms Dairy, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.