State v. Rendon
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtAlcala, J.
MEYERS, JOHNSON, RICHARDSON, and NEWELL, JJ., joined.
In this case, we are asked to decide whether it constitutes a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment for law-enforcement officers to bring a trained drug-detection, dog directly up to the front door of an apartment-home for the purpose of conducting a canine-narcotics sniff. We hold that it does. Consistent with the reasoning of the Supreme Court’s opinion, in Florida v. Jardines,1 we conclude that the officers’ use of a dog sniff at the front door of the apartment-home of Michael Eric Rendon, appellee, resulted in a physical…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McClintock, Bradley RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- State v. KonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Stuart Donald LuhmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. EdstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Michael Joseph Tilghman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.