Legal Opinion

State v. Rendon

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 2015No. NOS. PD-0013-15 & PD-0015-15PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcala, J.

MEYERS, JOHNSON, RICHARDSON, and NEWELL, JJ., joined.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether it constitutes a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment for law-enforcement officers to bring a trained drug-detection, dog directly up to the front door of an apartment-home for the purpose of conducting a canine-narcotics sniff. We hold that it does. Consistent with the reasoning of the Supreme Court’s opinion, in Florida v. Jardines,1 we conclude that the officers’ use of a dog sniff at the front door of the apartment-home of Michael Eric Rendon, appellee, resulted in a physical…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McClintock, Bradley RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. State v. KonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. State of Minnesota v. Stuart Donald LuhmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State v. EdstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. Michael Joseph Tilghman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API