Legal Opinion

Shymanski v. Nash

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1977No. 46661PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yetka, Justice.

This case arises out of a two-vehicle accident. The matter was tried to a jury which returned a verdict finding both plaintiff and defendant negligent, however, only the negligence of defendant was found to be a direct cause of the accident. Defendant’s motions, in the alternative, for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, amended findings of fact, or a new trial were denied. Judgment was entered on January 28, 1976. Defendant appeals from the denial of the motions and from the judgment. We affirm.

On August 16, 1969, a two-vehicle accident occurred on Interstate Highway No.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Pluwak v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Seivert v. BassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Fritz v. Arnold Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. State v. McCabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Marriage of Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Boland v. GarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API